Factors Contributing to Stress of Business/Marketing Educators

Authors

  • Bonita M. Johnson Southern Union State Community College
  • Leane B. Skinner Auburn University
  • Elisha C. Wohleb Auburn University
  • Elizabeth Alley Diamond Auburn University

Keywords:

Faculty Stress, Business Faculty, Marketing Faculty

Abstract

Problem: Business/marketing education teachers face demanding challenges with stress being a primary example. Teachers often suffer from tension, frustration, anxiety, anger, and even depression; and stress has been identified as a contributing factor for teacher attrition. Purpose: This study was designed to identify the level of stress among secondary business/marketing educators relating to administration, school climate, and resources that are associated with stress and to determine if business/marketing educators perceive they are receiving support from administration in dealing with factors associated with stress. Methodology: Data collected with a researcher-designed survey entitled Stress Questionnaire were analyzed using the following statistical procedures: Descriptive, Multiple Regression, Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA), and Pearson Product-Moment Correlation. Findings: Respondents reported that mild stress was due to school climate, mild to moderate stress was due to school administration, and mild to moderate stress was due to resources. There was a significant difference (p < .05) in the relationship between stress due to school climate and the level of support received from administrators in dealing with school climate. Likewise, a significant difference existed in the relationship between stress and resources and the level of support received from administrators in dealing with resources. No significant differences were found between self-reported personality type and the overall stress level reported for teaching, collegiality, school climate, administration, and resources. However, significant differences were found in the relationship between overall stress level and the individual stress factors for administration, school climate, administration, and resources. Business/marketing educators indicated the need for stress management workshops through in-service or professional development programs, implementation of coping strategies, and more administrative support in dealing with factors that cause stress.

References

Alhija, F. (2015). Teacher stress and coping: The role of personal and job characteristics. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 185, 374-380.

Brightwell, M. (1985). Factors involved in burnout among West Virginia teachers of exceptional children. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). West Virginia University.

Brown, S., & Nagel, L. (2004). Preparing future teachers to respond to stress: Sources and solutions. Action in Teacher Education, 26(1), 34-42.

Carey, G. (1998). Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA): I. Theory. Retrieved from www.psych.umn.edu/courses/spring07/federicoc/psy8815/lectures/Stats_Le cture7_Reading.pdf

Calabrese, R. (1987). The principal: An agent for reducing teacher stress. NASSP Bulletin, 71, 66-70.

Creech, S. (2003). Multivariate analysis and MANOVA. Retrieved from http://Statisticallysignificantconsulting.com/Manova-Statistic-SPSS.htm

Crute, S. (2004). Teacher Stress. NEA Today, 22(4), 34-35.

Dworkin, A. (1987). Teacher burnout in the public schools: Structural causes and consequences for children. Albany State, NY: State University of New York Press.

Gaziel, H. (1993). Coping with occupational stress among teachers: A crosscultural study. Comparative Education, 29(1), 67-79.

Gravetter, F., and Wallnau, L. (2002). Essentials of Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Stamford, CT: Thomson Learning, Inc.

Green, S., Salkind, N., & Akey, T. (1997). Using SPSS for Windows: Analyzing and understanding data. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Hagler, C. (1990). The business educator’s role in stress management. Business Education Forum, 44(4), 3-5.

Hammond, O., & Onikama, D. (1997). At risk teachers. Honolulu, HI: Pacific Resources for Educational Learning.

Jarvis, M. (2002). Teacher stress: A critical review of recent findings and suggestions for future research directions. Stress News. 14(1).

Kiff, S. (1986). Combating Teacher Burnout. In E. L. Green (Ed), Classroom Management in Business Education, 1986 Yearbook Issue (Business Education Forum). April/May, p. 15-18.

Klanderman, S. (1985). A study of teacher stress and principal leadership style in private urban schools. Dissertation Abstracts International, 46/09, 2503.

Kyriacou, C. (1987). Teacher stress and burnout: An international review. Educational Research, 29, 146-152.

Lane, D. (2003). Properties of Pearson’s r. Retrieved from http://cnx.org/content/m10951/2.2/

Pares, P. (1995). Prolonged teacher stress as a function of teachers perceptions of principal leadership style, adaptability and teachers belief system. (Doctoral dissertation, College of William and Mary). Dissertation Abstracts International, 56(6A), 2119.

Pedhazur, E., & Schmelkin, L. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.

Reese, R. (2004, August). The bottom line. American School Board Journal, 26-27.

Remley, D. (1985). Teacher stress and strain. Thrust, 14, 46-47.

Tammar, R. (1998). Impacts of stress, especially as it applies to teacher burnout. Retrieved from www.collegecourseonline.com/renewal/trail3/outcomes/matrix/impacts3.html

Downloads

Published

2018-06-01

How to Cite

Johnson , B. M., Skinner, L. B., Wohleb, E. C., & Diamond, E. A. (2018). Factors Contributing to Stress of Business/Marketing Educators. Journal of Research In Business Education, 59(1), 34-47. https://jrbe.nbea.org/index.php/jrbe/article/view/33

Similar Articles

1-10 of 65

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.