Immersive Feedback Preferred by Business Communication Students
Keywords:
Feedback, business communication, immersive feedback, meaningful feedback, Assessment feedback, student teacher relationshipsAbstract
Objective: This study investigated students’ perceptions and preferences of the most effective method of assessment to provide immersive, meaningful feedback on writing assignments. Students were asked to rank, hence determine which type of information
provided them the best feedback to improve their writing skills. Background: Learning can be amplified when the assessment process incorporates immersive feedback consisting of visual, auditory, and handwritten presentation. A multi-sensory approach not only reinforces learning, it personalizes the assessment process, engages students and helps ensure the learning and assessments respond to multiple student learning styles. Method: Undergraduate business communication students were surveyed to determine
their perceived most effective method of assessment on writing assignments. Results: The results indicated not only students’ familiarity with handwritten feedback, but also their preference for a process which incorporates immersive feedback consisting of
visual, auditory, and handwritten presentation. Conclusions: With assessment discussed throughout higher education as indicators of learning, students can sometimes be left out of the conversation. This research determined that students preferred the more
immersive feedback including the auditory, visual, and handwritten feedback. Students also indicated this type of feedback will enhance their writing skills. Application: This study provides techniques to grade and provide students with impactful feedback that not only has the ability to improve student grades but it deepens student-teacher relationships.
References
Denton, P., Madden, J., Roberts, M., & Row, P. (2008). Students’ response to traditional and computer-assisted formative feedback: A comparative case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(3), 486-500.
Faigley, L., & Miller, T. P. (October 1982). What we learn from writing on the job. College English, 44(6), 557-569.
Hickey, D.T., Ingram-Goble, A.A., & Jameson, E.M. (2009). Designing assessments and assessing designs in virtual educational environments. Journal of Science Education and Technology 18 187-208 doi: 10.1007/s10956-008-9143-1.
Huba, M. E., & Freed, J. E. (2000). Learner-centered assessment on college campuses —shifting the focus from teaching to learning. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon Publishers.
Immersive. (2011). In Dictionary.com. Retrieved from http://dictionary.reference.com/ browse/immersive
Jameson, D. A. (March 2007). Literacy in decline: Untangling the evidence. Business Communication Quarterly, 70(1), 16-33.
Maclellan, E. (2001). Assessment for learning: The differing perceptions of tutors and students, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(4). 307-318.
McEwen, B. C. (2003). Improving the writing skills of business majors: The collective responsibility of all courses and professors. Proceedings of the Association for Business Communication Annual Conference. Cincinnati, OH.
Parini, J. (2008). The unbearable importance of grading. Chronicle of Higher Education, 54(23), A38-A38. Retrieved from Academic Search Premier database.
Taylor, C. (2007). Preparing students for the business of the real (and quantitative) world. Retrieved from http://www.maa.org/QL/cvc/cvc-109-124.pdf
University of Southern California. (2007). Assessment of teaching and learning. Center for Excellence in Teaching. Retrieved from http://www.usc.edu/programs/cet/resources/assessment/
Weaver, M.R. (2006). Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 31 (3) 379-394. Doi: 10.1080/02602930500353061.
Wikipedia. (2011). Immersion (virtual reality). Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immersion_(virtual_reality)
Wilkinson, K., Crews, T. B., & Kinley, E. (2008). Enriching the learning experience for e-learners: Making assessment real. Proceedings of the 2008 Higher Learning Commission Annual Conference, 3, 75-77, Chicago, IL.
Wojtas, O. (1998, September 25). Feedback? No, just give us the answers, Times Higher Education Supplement.